Ok, that one is fixed.

Does that mean it works (at least all the tests) on ppc32 now?


2009/11/5 Bryan Kearney <bkearney@redhat.com>:

> On 11/03/2009 01:46 PM, Wayne Meissner wrote:

>>
>> 2009/11/4 Bryan Kearney<bkearney@redhat.com>:

>>>
>>> I  have applied both, and I have gotten past the earlier issue (Thank
>>> you!).
>>> I am now seeing different errors on ppc and ppc64. On the ppc build [1] I
>>> build and get a couple of unit test failures.. On the ppc64 build [2] I
>>> see
>>> a wierd error about wrong number of arguments.

>>
>> I'm not surprised.  You're probably the first person on the planet to
>> try ruby-ffi on either ppc-linux or ppc64-linux.
>>
>> You have two choices:
>> 1) Cut your losses and declare the package usable for i386 and x86_64
>> only.  This is probably the easiest path, and given how obsolete ppc
>> machines are, probably not a huge loss.
>>
>> 2) Learn enough details about the ppc32 and ppc64 abi, and debug
>> ruby-ffi.  It will probably turn out to be something simple, but it
>> could take a lot of tears and pain to track down.  The upside is that
>> this will help knock out any bugs for other arches like arm.
>>
>> Naturally, I advocate option #1.

>
> Yeah.. If I dont get this running in fedora I wont be able to use it for
> Augeas/Puppet.
>
> Here is a patch for the ppc platform. Change is in the test library only.
>
> -- bk
>
>