Subject: Re: [ruby-ffi] Re: lists only one lib? |
From: Jon |
Date: 12/21/09 9:11 AM |
To: ruby-ffi@googlegroups.com |
Anyway my question is then...should ffi_lib be additive? -r
I'm not for this idea as I think it opens up the door to more sequencing usage style of faux bugs. Take a look at library.rb for #attach_function and #attach_variable and see how they might work with additive #ffi_lib intermingled with calls to each. Don't know if anyone would actually code that way, but... What's the value add you see for an additive ffi_lib? Jon