On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, rogerdpack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure if this is necessary, but I recently saw a bug report
> that, for one user, the fact that they weren't using stdcall for their
> method declarations was causing a memory leak.  Maybe it should
> default to stdcall on windows since that's what dll's default to,
> isn't it?
>

DLLs that are not Microsoft ones can safely be cdecl

defaulting to stdcall will make they need to explicitly state that also.

> Thoughts? Or maybe I'm repeating myself here.

There is no win-win situation more than "indicating". Explicit over implicit.
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupéry